![]() Yes, extrusion multiplier affects ALL extrusion which is happening during the print, regardless of line type. ![]() Changing the line spacing to print more spindly lines doesn't seem like the best solution.Ī flow rate compensation, on the other hand, would help push extra filament into the under-extruded bridge, helping to fill these gaps and increase bonding with the bridge layer. With under constrained extrusions, printed with flow rates for a well constrained extrusion, you will just get spindly little lines, not likely to bond well to anything. For the same reason that bridge flow is calculated very differently than normal flow (round extrusion vs thin rectangle), there isn't true support under the "above bridge" lines. Why? Because the whole purpose is to recover a bridged area that has likely sagged. IMO, this "above bridge flow" compensation, would give a better result, if it were just a flow rate compensation applied to all lines over the bridged area. Here is a project that shows even with "above bridge flow" set to 200%, the layer above the bridge is identical to subsequent layers in line spacing, and in volumetric flow. that compensation is only being applied to infill lines, not to perimeters. Okay, I see why you think it works, and I think it doesn't. To fine tune the perfection of a print, each line type should have its own flow adjustment. I think this is a bug, at least related to "above the bridge" flow control. Solid layer is overflowing, there's nothing i can do about it. Ok, this could actually fix the overflow problem, but it's not right.Ĭhange the flow of "above the bridge" and observeįlow change should just reduce extrusion amount, pattern and spacing should not change. However, that solid layer above the bridge is not changing the flow then (why?), but it is changing a pattern density. There's no flow control of solid fill, but I have found a workaround if just one top solid layer is enough -I reduce "over_bridge_flow_ratio". ![]() Then I adjust the flow and get somewhat better result for bottom and top (75%!). Visual animation looks nice, but on printer it's terrible. They are ovelflowing and ruining the layer. Windows Version: Windows 10 (build 19043), 64-bit editionĪll fills (except the infill) are to rich. Build: SuperSlicer_2.3.57.10 Operating system type + version
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |